[146413] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [Cryptography] Email and IM are ideal candidates
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (radix42@gmail.com)
Tue Aug 27 17:53:39 2013
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
To: "ianG" <iang@iang.org>,
"Cryptography Mailing List" <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
From: radix42@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 21:33:01 +0000
Reply-To: radix42@gmail.com
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com
Iang wrote:
>Why do we need the 1980s assumption of >being able to send freely to
>everyone, anyway?
tech.support@I.bought.your.busted.thing.com is one that comes to mind. info@sale.me.your.thing.com is another. I think the types of "prior whitelist only" secure systems being discussed on-list here lately will in the long run win out with the lions share of messages, but that bog standard 'dirty' email will persist for commercial interactions of the type I list above.
-David Mercer
David Mercer
Portland, OR
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
