[146415] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Cryptography] Email and IM are ideal candidates for mix

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Phillip Hallam-Baker)
Tue Aug 27 19:25:33 2013

X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <521D1456.3020704@pelicancrossing.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:00:36 -0400
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: "Wendy M. Grossman" <wendyg@pelicancrossing.net>
Cc: "cryptography@metzdowd.com" <cryptography@metzdowd.com>,
	ianG <iang@iang.org>
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com

--===============6534155580312602552==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3eee441880104e4f5d78c

--001a11c3eee441880104e4f5d78c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Wendy M. Grossman <
wendyg@pelicancrossing.net> wrote:

> On 08/27/2013 18:34, ianG wrote:
> > Why do we need the 1980s assumption of being able to send freely to
> > everyone, anyway?
>
> It's clear you're not a journalist or working in any other profession
> where you actually need to be able to communicate spontaneously with
> strangers.
>

True, but you are probably willing to tolerate a higher level of spam
getting through in that case.

One hypothesis that I would like to throw out is that there is no point in
accepting encrypted email from someone who does not have a key to encrypt
the response.



-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/

--001a11c3eee441880104e4f5d78c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail=
_quote">On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Wendy M. Grossman <span dir=3D"ltr=
">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:wendyg@pelicancrossing.net" target=3D"_blank">wendy=
g@pelicancrossing.net</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=3D"im">On 08/27/2013 18:34, ianG =
wrote:<br>
&gt; Why do we need the 1980s assumption of being able to send freely to<br=
>
&gt; everyone, anyway?<br>
<br>
</div>It&#39;s clear you&#39;re not a journalist or working in any other pr=
ofession<br>
where you actually need to be able to communicate spontaneously with<br>
strangers.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>True, but you are probably w=
illing to tolerate a higher level of spam getting through in that case.</di=
v><div><br></div><div>One hypothesis that I would like to throw out is that=
 there is no point in accepting encrypted email from someone who does not h=
ave a key to encrypt the response.</div>
<div><br></div><div>=A0</div></div><div><br></div>-- <br>Website: <a href=
=3D"http://hallambaker.com/">http://hallambaker.com/</a><br>
</div></div>

--001a11c3eee441880104e4f5d78c--

--===============6534155580312602552==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
--===============6534155580312602552==--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post