[146555] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [Cryptography] IPv6 and IPSEC
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Taral)
Wed Sep 4 02:50:33 2013
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <20130904035417.GA18691@cypherpunks.to>
From: Taral <taralx@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 22:27:14 -0700
To: Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>,
Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>,
Cryptography List <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to> wrote:
> In its cryptic explanation of the bounces, Google makes one thing clear: whatever
> reason they have to bounce the email, that reason only applies to IPv6. I believe
> this is wrong.
It only applies to IPv6 because applying it to IPv4 would break too
many people. Not enough people use IPv6, so they are insisting on good
hygiene there.
Why do you not have PTR records for your IPv6 address? The problem is
that, not Google's policy.
--
Taral <taralx@gmail.com>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
