[146833] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [Cryptography] Opening Discussion: Speculation on "BULLRUN"
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Peter Bowen)
Sun Sep 8 13:31:19 2013
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <201309080150.r881o6qK027453@new.toad.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 10:02:19 -0700
From: Peter Bowen <pzbowen@gmail.com>
To: John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>
Cc: Ray Dillinger <bear@sonic.net>, cryptography@metzdowd.com
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:50 PM, John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com> wrote:
> PS: My long-standing domain registrar (enom.com) STILL doesn't support
> DNSSEC records -- which is why toad.com doesn't have DNSSEC
> protection. Can anybody recommend a good, cheap, reliable domain
> registrar who DOES update their software to support standards from ten
> years ago?
PIR (the .org registry) has a field in their registrar list indicating
if the registrar supports DNSSEC:
http://www.pir.org/get/registrars?order=field_dnssec_value&sort=desc
If you exclude all the name.com and Go Daddy shell registrars, you
still have more than 30 to choose from. I would be shocked if they
didn't all offer .com in addition to .org.
Thanks,
Peter
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
