[147330] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Cryptography] RSA equivalent key length/strength

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Viktor Dukhovni)
Mon Sep 30 00:20:13 2013

X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 04:15:50 +0000
From: Viktor Dukhovni <cryptography@dukhovni.org>
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <5248C0B2.6090406@echeque.com>
Reply-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:07:14AM +1000, James A. Donald wrote:

> Therefore, everyone should use Curve25519, which we have every
> reason to believe is unbreakable.

Superceded by the improved Curve1174.

    http://cr.yp.to/elligator/elligator-20130527.pdf 

-- 
	Viktor.
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post