[147474] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [Cryptography] AES-256- More NIST-y? paranoia
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ray Dillinger)
Thu Oct 3 09:43:23 2013
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 20:13:34 -0700
From: Ray Dillinger <bear@sonic.net>
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <524C8C8B.5050907@gladman.plus.com>
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com
On 10/02/2013 02:13 PM, Brian Gladman wrote:
> The NIST specification only eliminated Rijndael options - none of the
> Rijndael options included in AES were changed in any way by NIST.
Leaving aside the question of whether anyone "weakened" it, is it
true that AES-256 provides comparable security to AES-128?
Bear
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
