[147499] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Cryptography] encoding formats should not be committee'ised

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ray Dillinger)
Sat Oct 5 10:34:03 2013

X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 09:24:12 -0700
From: Ray Dillinger <bear@sonic.net>
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <524E7B09.9000803@echeque.com>
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com

On 10/04/2013 01:23 AM, James A. Donald wrote:
> On 2013-10-04 09:33, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>> The design of WSDL and SOAP is entirely due to the need to impedance match COM to HTTP.
>
> That is fairly horrifying, as COM was designed for a single threaded environment, and becomes and incomprehensible and extraordinarily inefficient security hole
> in a multi threaded environment.

Well, yes, as a matter of fact DCOM was always incomprehensible
and extraordinarily inefficient.  However, it wasn't so much of
a security hole in the "remotely crashable bug" sense.  It made
session management into something of a difficult problem though.

					Bear
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post