[147666] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [Cryptography] /dev/random is not robust
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dan McDonald)
Mon Oct 14 20:53:37 2013
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 20:47:50 -0400
From: Dan McDonald <danmcd@kebe.com>
To: Cryptography List <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
In-Reply-To: <4ca15bb1026e7a249f79a415fb1f9042.squirrel@www.deadhat.com>
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:35:13AM -0000, dj@deadhat.com wrote:
> http://eprint.iacr.org/2013/338.pdf
*LINUX* /dev/random is not robust, so claims the paper.
I wonder how various *BSDs or the Solarish family (Illumos, Oracle Solaris)
hold up under similar scrutiny?
Linux is big, but it is not everything.
Dan
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
