[14803] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: US antispam bill is death to anonymity

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dan Geer)
Mon Nov 24 11:15:01 2003

X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 23 Nov 2003 20:15:46 EST."
             <Pine.BSF.4.21.0311232012260.6093-100000@greeves.mfn.org> 
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 08:02:23 -0500
From: Dan Geer <geer@TheWorld.com>


The natural consequence of zero-cost ("free") speech 
is to make freedom from speech (privacy) unquenchably
attractive.

If you would preserve anonymity, you must raise the 
costs of those who will not shut up.  We technocrats
have had years to do something and we have not; the
ball is now in other courts.

--dan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post