[148220] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [Cryptography] Dark Mail Alliance specs?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ralf Senderek)
Sat Nov 23 14:00:00 2013
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 13:30:13 +0100 (CET)
From: Ralf Senderek <crypto@senderek.ie>
To: Cryptography <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
In-Reply-To: <20131123121801.A3C8926E0D@laptop.kerry-linux.ie>
Reply-To: Ralf Senderek <crypto@senderek.ie>
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013, David Mercer wrote:
> But of course you're right about actual current usage, encrypted email is an
> epic fail on that measure regardless of format/protocol.
>
> -David Mercer
Yes, but it's about time we do something about that. Do we *exactly know
why* it is such a failure?
People are using the internet, they are typing sensitive information into
textareas and send them off, and on the other hand "/usr/bin/gpg" is
installed on almost every server, why can't we make Johnny Average use it?
With the Web Encryption Extension I am going down that road.
-- Ralf
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
