[148231] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [Cryptography] Dark Mail Alliance specs?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James A. Donald)
Sun Nov 24 00:54:32 2013
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 14:31:27 +1000
From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwi6G-KcKtjS2mVaUyxr5rbXdrAkFwM0uD79+AHcg+d10g@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: jamesd@echeque.com
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com
On 2013-11-24 07:24, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> The last thing we need now is a second VHS vs Betamax standards war on
> secure mail formats.
You are worried we might have two widely adopted secure messaging
systems, when at present we have zero widely adopted secure messaging
systems?
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
