[14841] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Problems with GPG El Gamal signing keys?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven M. Bellovin)
Mon Dec 1 16:45:11 2003
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
To: "Anton Stiglic" <astiglic@okiok.com>
Cc: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 01 Dec 2003 11:20:10 PST."
<00ea01c3b840$239179a0$5900a8c0@p1038mobile>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 14:01:34 -0500
In message <00ea01c3b840$239179a0$5900a8c0@p1038mobile>, "Anton Stiglic" writes
:
>
>By the way, is the paper by Phong Q. Nguyen describing the vulnerability
>available somewhere?
This note appeared on the IETF OpenPGP mailing list.
--
Subject: Re: Removing Elgamal signatures
From: David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 12:31:11 -0500
To: ietf-openpgp@imc.org
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 08:46:25AM -0800, Hal Finney wrote:
> It would be good to see these results made available because they might
> turn out to be applicable to other types of keys that we might consider
> in the future.
The paper is as yet unpublished, but the author's web page with
contact info is http://www.di.ens.fr/~pnguyen/
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
