![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com In-Reply-To: <993B4DD7-498D-475A-AD65-CD92ED4B201D@kinostudios.com> Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 11:21:20 +0000 From: Ben Laurie <ben@links.org> To: Greg <greg@kinostudios.com> Cc: Cryptography <cryptography@metzdowd.com> Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com On 14 December 2013 00:10, Greg <greg@kinostudios.com> wrote: > Hi list, > > Moving this into its own thread: > > DNSNMC fixes the authentication problems previously described, and it > addresses all of the problems that with the previously mentioned proposal= s. > It does this first by combining DNS with Namecoin (NMC), and then by > encouraging a =93trust only those you know=94 policy.5 > > =93Namecoin is an open source decentralized key/value registration and > transfer system based on Bitcoin technology=94.[16] Namecoin =93squares Z= ooko=92s > Triangle=94, meaning, it makes it possible to have domain names (and other > types of identifiers) that are: > > Authenticated: users can be certain that they are not speaking to an > impostor > > Decentralized: there is no central authority controlling all the names As I pointed out elsewhere, Bitcoin (and hence Namecoin) is not decentralised: http://www.links.org/files/decentralised-currencies.pdf. > Human-readable: names look just like today=92s domain names _______________________________________________ The cryptography mailing list cryptography@metzdowd.com http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |