[148467] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

[Cryptography] The next generation secure email solution

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ralf Senderek)
Mon Dec 16 12:33:07 2013

X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 21:19:05 +0100 (CET)
From: Ralf Senderek <crypto@senderek.ie>
To: Cryptography <cryptography@metzdowd.com>, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>
Cc: crypto@senderek.ie
Reply-To: Ralf Senderek <crypto@senderek.ie>
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com

On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 grarpamp wrote:

> The only way to have any real global seamless success is to go
> ground up with a completely new model. IMO, that will be some
> form of p2p message system where every address is a crypto key,
> masked for grandma by her contact list, decrypted out your p2p
> daemon and piped into your local mail processing (MUA/filter/lists)
> and filesystem (encryption). At least that way your local mail tools
> will still work (no one will give those up anyway).

If you are so sure, can you tell us how the next generation secure email
solution will solve the "trust problem", please. How does the p2p daemon
find the correct crypto key, so that every user can rely on its invisible
performance?

      --ralf
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post