[148674] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [Cryptography] RSA is dead.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ianG)
Tue Dec 24 17:15:27 2013
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 01:05:14 +0300
From: ianG <iang@iang.org>
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <52B931AE.8060800@echeque.com>
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com
On 24/12/13 10:03 AM, James A. Donald wrote:
> On 2013-12-23 08:55, Jerry Leichter wrote:
> > http://graphics.stanford.edu/~danielrh/vote/mzalewski.c - just one
> Not having the developer in front of me to be roasted, took thirty
> minutes of my time.
90 mins + copious slurps of xmas cheer + rusty(C),,,, and I found it.
effing macros, this bird is worth two in the ...
I think I somewhat agree with James. I could have rewritten that code
in less time than it took to fund the flaw. But that concept only works
when (a) I know there is a flaw ... which the comp kinda reveals and (b)
i can rewrite myself or somehow magik the blubbercoder to do a better job.
I also agree with Jerry. If I could find the Jameses of the world and
employ them for cheap, I'd be happy as Santa.
So, assuming I sober up by the morn, and SO doesn't notice, where's
Ping's code?
iang (hic!) merry xmas all, and may your cheer not infect your macros
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
