[148882] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Cryptography] What is a secure conversation? (Was: online

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jonathan Thornburg)
Thu Jan 2 16:19:08 2014

X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 11:44:48 -0800 (PST)
From: Jonathan Thornburg <jthorn@astro.indiana.edu>
To: Alan Braggins <alan.braggins@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <52C54440.3020302@gmail.com>
Cc: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com

On Thu, 2 Jan 2014, Alan Braggins wrote:

> On 01/01/14 18:28, Patrick Mylund Nielsen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com
> > <mailto:hallam@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > 
> > >     The nuclear codes leaked long ago. I know the navy one from the 60s
> 
> > http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/12/launch-code-for-us-nukes-was-00000000-for-20-years/
> 
> I've seen another version of that story that adds an important detail,
> but I don't know which version is correct.
[[...]]

The most detailed and authoritative (public) version is probably
  http://tomnichols.net/blog/2013/12/20/update-were-u-s-nuclear-codes-set-to-zero-bruce-blair-responds/

-- 
-- "Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]" <jthorn@astro.indiana-zebra.edu>
   Dept of Astronomy & IUCSS, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
   "There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched
    at any given moment.  How often, or on what system, the Thought Police
    plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork.  It was even conceivable
    that they watched everybody all the time."  -- George Orwell, "1984"
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post