[149042] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Cryptography] Boing Boing pushing an RSA Conference boycott

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bear)
Tue Jan 14 13:57:22 2014

X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
From: Bear <bear@sonic.net>
To: Kent Borg <kentborg@borg.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:36:00 -0800
In-Reply-To: <52D43B89.3090101@borg.org>
Cc: "cryptography@metzdowd.com" <cryptography@metzdowd.com>,
	Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com

On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 14:16 -0500, Kent Borg wrote:
> On 01/13/2014 10:23 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> > Unless someone shows evidence that RSA actually knew they were being
> > punked, the boycott makes no sense. 

> If we can't make selling security pay, we can maybe make selling 
> insecurity cost.  There are a lot of other suits watching this, seeing 
> how RSA fairs.  I want them to see something gruesome, something that 
> worries them.  (The same way I want a banker or two who nearly dumped us 
> into DEPRESSION to go to jail, so others will think twice.)

I tend to agree.  If RSA doesn't go down in flames over its utter 
failure, then people will learn from that fact that security is a 
joke industry.  That's a problem we already have badly enough with 
the failure after failure after failure revealed by the Snowdon
files.

I don't think that there is any real hope of building a secure 
infrastructure for the world if the world learns by this example 
that an industry leading security company can completely fail in 
its primary mission without consequence.  

That would be a vote of no confidence in the entire security 
industry, like an acknowledgement that there can never be security 
and there's no point in even trying. 

That said, I don't think a conference boycott is specific enough. 
A conference boycott hurts everyone at the conference.  And most 
of them have not been complicit (or merely incompetent, which is 
nearly as bad) in betrayal of the public. 



_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post