[149289] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [Cryptography] Unified resource on Random Number Generation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James A. Donald)
Sat Feb 1 00:16:34 2014
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 13:01:54 +1000
From: "James A. Donald" <Jamesd@echeque.com>
To: Arnold Reinhold <agr@me.com>
In-Reply-To: <9C4BA351-5728-400C-93AE-00A01CA7E067@me.com>
Cc: Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>,
Thierry Moreau <thierry.moreau@connotech.com>,
"cryptography@metzdowd.com" <cryptography@metzdowd.com>,
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, ianG <iang@iang.org>
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com
On 2014-02-01 04:39, Arnold Reinhold wrote:
> Is there any interest in developing a unified resource on RNG for Cryptography that summarizes the various viewpoints expressed here recently? It wouldn't have to resolve debates like general purpose computer vs engineered crypto hardware, or one good entropy source vs hash together everything, but instead present the arguments and engineering trade offs involved. As I envision it, it would also summarize and point to existing standards and implementations where they exist.
>
> In particular, are any posters willing to release what they have written under a Creative Commons license, with or without attribution?
Sure
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
