|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com From: "Dave Howe" <DaveHowe@gmx.co.uk> To: "Email List: Cryptography" <cryptography@metzdowd.com> Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 14:41:38 -0000 Paul A.S. Ward wrote: > I'm not sure why no one has considered the PC banking problem to be a > justification for secure computing. Specifically, how does a user > know their computer has not been tampered with when they wish to use > it for banking access. I think PC banking is an argument *against* Secure Computing as currently proposed - there is no way to discover if there is a nasty "running" in protected memory or removing it if there is. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |