[149340] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [Cryptography] cheap sources of entropy
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James A. Donald)
Mon Feb  3 19:36:55 2014
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 09:05:10 +1000
From: "James A. Donald" <Jamesd@echeque.com>
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <CAAMy4USTOKeRdsb80=xkNsb26hVvCJMxNtRBB69uT8djb=2z7w@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============7221095522331221703==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------050306090805080603030302"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------050306090805080603030302
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 2014-02-04 07:13, Tom Mitchell wrote:
>
>     Go back to the paper that proposed using turbulence and repeat
>     some of their tests in a virtual environment.  Let us know what
>     you *actually observe*.
>
They made everything artificially simple - because otherwise there are 
so many sources of timing randomness that you could not distinguish the 
turbulence induced timing randomness.
If you look at timing in a complex system, it looks random.
To conclude that something that looks random truly is random, you have 
to understand and measure the underlying causes of randomness.
To isolate and identify /one/ such source of randomness, required them 
to artificially constrain the system in a way that was not realistic, 
nor intended to be realistic.
So their argument, in essence was that when they took all these 
extremely drastic measures to make timing of events predictable, timing 
of events was /still/ not predictable due to underlying physical processes.
 From which we may confidently conclude that in more complex situations, 
timing will be less predictable, not more predictable, because we have 
more sources of randomness, many  poorly characterized sources of 
randomness interacting with other sources of randomness, /one/ of which 
is well characterized.
--------------050306090805080603030302
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2014-02-04 07:13, Tom Mitchell
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAAMy4USTOKeRdsb80=xkNsb26hVvCJMxNtRBB69uT8djb=2z7w@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra">
          <div class="gmail_quote"><br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">Go
              back to the paper that proposed using turbulence and
              repeat some of their tests in a virtual environment.  Let
              us know what you *actually observe*.<br>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <br>
    They made everything artificially simple - because otherwise there
    are so many sources of timing randomness that you could not
    distinguish the turbulence induced timing randomness.<br>
    <br>
    If you look at timing in a complex system, it looks random.<br>
    <br>
    To conclude that something that looks random truly is random, you
    have to understand and measure the underlying causes of randomness. 
    <br>
    <br>
    To isolate and identify <i>one</i> such source of randomness,
    required them to artificially constrain the system in a way that was
    not realistic, nor intended to be realistic.<br>
    <br>
    So their argument, in essence was that when they took all these
    extremely drastic measures to make timing of events predictable,
    timing of events was <i>still</i> not predictable due to underlying
    physical processes.<br>
    <br>
    From which we may confidently conclude that in more complex
    situations, timing will be less predictable, not more predictable,
    because we have more sources of randomness, many  poorly
    characterized sources of randomness interacting with other sources
    of randomness, <i>one</i> of which is well characterized.<br>
  </body>
</html>
--------------050306090805080603030302--
--===============7221095522331221703==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
--===============7221095522331221703==--