[15027] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
RE: Difference between TCPA-Hardware and a smart card (was: example: secure computing kernel needed)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Antonomasia)
Tue Dec 23 13:41:21 2003
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
To: cme@acm.org, schoen@loyalty.org
Cc: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:20:41 +0000 (GMT)
From: ant@notatla.org.uk (Antonomasia)
From: "Carl Ellison" <cme@acm.org>
> Some TPM-machines will be owned by people who decide to do what I
> suggested: install a personal firewall that prevents remote attestation.
How confident are you this will be possible ? Why do you think the
remote attestation traffic won't be passed in a widespread service
like HTTP - or even be steganographic ?
--
##############################################################
# Antonomasia ant notatla.org.uk #
# See http://www.notatla.org.uk/ #
##############################################################
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
