[15179] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Problems with GPG El Gamal signing keys?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Werner Koch)
Fri Jan 9 10:26:27 2004

X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
To: iang@systemics.com
Cc: cryptography@metzdowd.com
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:45:24 +0100
In-Reply-To: <3FC626B5.A921B6E6@systemics.com> (Ian Grigg's message of "Thu,
 27 Nov 2003 11:30:45 -0500")

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 11:30:45 -0500, Ian Grigg said:

>> such keys to give them extra time to revoke the keys.  However one
>> addresss was from killfile.org and actually a mail-news gateway ...

> Was said key was being used to sign messages of some
> authentication importance?

I don't know.

> art.  Werner, if you come across any cases where
> people are incovenienced beyond the normal key &
> code replacement issues, I'd hope you can share the
> anecdotes with us (suitably anonymised as appropriate)?

Regarding this ElGamal sign bug, the only thing I heard of were a very
few Debian developers who lost all their key signatures and have to
start again gathering new signatures from their co-Debian developers.
However there was no anger about this it sounds more like, "oops, I
shoot myself into my foot with my self-build secure thing".

  Werner

-- 
Werner Koch                                      <wk@gnupg.org>
The GnuPG Experts                                http://g10code.com
Free Software Foundation Europe                  http://fsfeurope.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post