[16955] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: SHA1 broken?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dave Howe)
Tue Feb 22 11:58:57 2005

X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:53:53 +0000
From: Dave Howe <DaveHowe@gmx.co.uk>
To: <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
In-Reply-To: <BAY0-SMTP03A5D711D0FAFAB894EA66AC6E0@phx.gbl>

Joseph Ashwood wrote:
> I believe you substantially misunderstood my statements, 2^69 work is 
> doable _now_. 2^55 work was performed in 72 hours in 1998, scaling 
> forward the 7 years to the present (and hence through known data) leads 
> to a situation where the 2^69 work is achievable today in a reasonable 
> timeframe (3 days), assuming reasonable quantities of available money 
> ($500,000US). There is no guessing about what the future holds for this, 
> the 2^69 work is NOW.
I wasn't aware that FPGA technology had improved that much if any - feel 
free to correct my misapprehension in that area though :)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post