[24677] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Linux RNG paper
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (markus reichelt)
Thu May 4 21:48:16 2006
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 20:26:32 +0200
From: markus reichelt <ml@mareichelt.de>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605041806100.4407@pl2.zayda.com>
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Mail-Followup-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
--2oox5VnwalALFvA7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
* Jason Holt <jason@lunkwill.org> wrote:
> >On Thu, 04 May 2006 18:14:09 +0200, markus reichelt <ml@mareichelt.de>
> >wrote:
> >>Agreed; but regarding unix systems, I know of none crypto
> >>implementation that does integrity checking. Not just de/encrypt the
> >>data, but verify that the encrypted data has not been tampered with.
>=20
> There's also ecryptfs:
>=20
> http://ecryptfs.sourceforge.net/
Thanks to you both; and good to see that ecryptfs is actively
maintained. I might check it out myself but I'll definitely link it.
I'm interested as well in watermark/dictionary attacks (like on
mainline cryptoloop) on ecryptfs. Something like mentioned here,
http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/2005-11/msg00016.html
Users of ecrypt are also encouraged to share their views on
stability/reliability of ecryptfs.
--=20
left blank, right bald
--2oox5VnwalALFvA7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEWkdYLMyTO8Kj/uQRAlAqAKCE71orGOGEpBnuzZnqNZV7DyKauQCdEnSM
7CMo6Esn55QZhX9pqvr+CMA=
=XvWR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--2oox5VnwalALFvA7--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
