[27511] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Status of SRP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James A. Donald)
Wed Jun 7 19:57:40 2006
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 07:55:08 +1000
From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <4486BAF7.5040307@garlic.com>
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler wrote:
> part of x9.59 retail payment standard requires the
> transaction to be authenticated. another part of the
> x9.59 retail payment standard requires that the
> account number in x9.59 retail payments can't be used
> in non-authenticated transactions. it as been
> recognized for a long time that a major source of
> account financial fraud has been the data breaches
> http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subpubkey.html#harvest
Have any merchants adopted the X9.59 standard?
Is it in fact possible for a merchant to today take
orders over X9.59?
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
SCLw5bENxW3GhAPjMCCFxAZNTWWplgH3XHfzZejK
4wUo1x4tRVdskoDX1ZgiomicCYwgwFPLepwR04i2a
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
