|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 23:22:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20060615233628.f7014f14.smb@cs.columbia.edu> From: "Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com> To: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu>, "David Wagner" <daw@cs.berkeley.edu> Cc: <cryptography@metzdowd.com> My personal opinion is that no deliberate weaknesses were introduced. More likely there might have been a Chinese image at some level that they would run the CA for all the WAPI certificates, at least those used in China. Donald=20 -----Original Message----- From: owner-cryptography@metzdowd.com [mailto:owner-cryptography@metzdowd.com] On Behalf Of Steven M. Bellovin Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 11:36 PM To: David Wagner Cc: cryptography@metzdowd.com Subject: Re: Chinese WAPI protocol? One unspoken issue has always been whether or not the Chinese government has deliberately sabotaged the spec, presumably for domestic espionage. Is there any evidence of that? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |