[2865] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: A plausible argument why the ITAR are not valid.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Perry E. Metzger)
Thu Jun 25 16:43:36 1998
To: "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
cc: cryptography@c2.net
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 25 Jun 1998 15:52:49 EDT."
<Pine.GSO.3.96.980625145252.14105G-100000@boxster>
Reply-To: perry@piermont.com
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 16:21:03 -0400
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
"Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" writes:
> I have just read an amazing article which argues rather persuasively that
> the ITAR are invalid because they fail to conform with the Paperwork
> Reduction Act.
Were this true, would not the administration simply fix the problem
very quickly, thus restoring the regulations and rendering this of
interest only to those facing prosecution for acts performed in the
past?
Perry
