[29476] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: EDP (entropy distribution protocol), userland PRNG design
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jack Lloyd)
Sun Jul 2 11:29:11 2006
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 11:21:27 -0400
From: Jack Lloyd <lloyd@randombit.net>
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Mail-Followup-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <d4f1333a0607020125s7c602cc6p3543c9b1a187fc29@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 03:25:09AM -0500, Travis H. wrote:
> Going over old emails.
>
> On 10/12/05, Jack Lloyd <lloyd@randombit.net> wrote:
> >I prefer a multi-stage design, as described by various people smarter than
> >I
> >am:
> >
> > source(s) --> mixer --> pool --> extractor --> X9.31
>
> Did you really mean X9.31 and not X9.17?
Yes. IIRC, same thing, just in a different standard. (And I have a
copy of X9.31, while I've never even read X9.17)
-J
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
