[30492] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Interesting bit of a quote

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adam Fields)
Tue Jul 11 17:00:55 2006

X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 14:05:11 -0400
From: Adam Fields <cryptography23094893@aquick.org>
To: "Leichter, Jerry" <leichter_jerrold@emc.com>
Cc: Richard Stiennon <richard@stiennon.com>,
	cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.61.0607111254080.15505@mental>

On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 01:02:27PM -0400, Leichter, Jerry wrote:
[...]
> Business ultimately depends on trust.  There's some study out there -
> I don't recall a reference - that basically finds that the level of
> trust is directly related to the level of economic success of an
> economy.  There are costs associated with verification, some of them
> easily quantifiable, some of them much harder to pin down.  The
> difficulty is in making the tradeoffs.  We're now pushing way over
> on the verification side, in a natural reaction to a series of major
> frauds and scandals.

Trust is not quite the opposite of security (in the sense of an
action, not as a state of being), but certainly they're mutually
exclusive. If you have trust, you have no need for security.

Personally, given the choice, I'd rather have trust. I think that this
is a distinction that could be made more often when deciding on how to
implement a security system.

-- 
				- Adam

** Expert Technical Project and Business Management
**** System Performance Analysis and Architecture
****** [ http://www.adamfields.com ]

[ http://www.aquick.org/blog ] ............ Blog
[ http://www.adamfields.com/resume.html ].. Experience
[ http://www.flickr.com/photos/fields ] ... Photos
[ http://www.aquicki.com/wiki ].............Wiki

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post