[3117] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: NSA Losing Crypto Experts

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Pescatore)
Thu Jul 30 15:20:14 1998

From: John Pescatore <John.Pescatore@entrust.com>
To: "'Rick Smith'" <rick_smith@securecomputing.com>,
        "'cryptography@c2.net'"
	 <cryptography@c2.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 09:25:35 -0400

Most of what the Big 6 (Fab 5, Final 4: what are they down to now?) have
been hiring from NSA are generic engineers who have worked at the Agency for
20 or more years and can take early outs. Generally not the cream of the
crypto crop - those companies are looking for "rain makers" not
cryptologists. 

JP

John Pescatore                           johnp@entrust.com 
Senior Consultant                       301-421-4055
Entrust Technologies, Inc.           301-421-4052 (fax)



-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Smith [mailto:rick_smith@securecomputing.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 1998 7:22 PM
To: nelson@media.mit.edu; cryptography@c2.net
Subject: Re: NSA Losing Crypto Experts


Nelson Minar wrote about not wanting to work at NSA:

>What's the fun
>in producing a great piece of software crypto if the only way it gets
>out the door is in embedded military applications?

According to NSA tradition, by the way, crypto and software don't mix. You
can do one or the other, but never, never do both at the same time. They're
traditionally spooked by the fact that it's hard to make reliable
predictions about the behavior of software. If you look at what the Orange
Book tried to do, the underlying and unspoken theme is that a true A1
system might allow them to run crypto in software with an acceptable level
of confidence.

Rick.
smith@securecomputing.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post