[615] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: The unmentionable algorithm

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rich Salz)
Mon Apr 21 14:03:57 1997

Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 12:42:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
To: jamesd@echeque.com, coderpunks@toad.com, cryptography@c2.net

> If one used this a commercial product, but refrained from 
> calling it RC4, one should be legally on very strong ground.

I know of no large software company (and this includes Digital, HP,
IBM, Microsoft) who feels this way.  Actually, I can make a stronger
statement:  I know they disagree.

> Have any commercial products used this approach successfully,
> called it something other than and not paid and not been sued?

I cannot imagine any company that is big enough to have their own lawyers
letting this happen.
	/r$


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post