[76485] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: It's a Presidential Mandate, Feds use it. How come you are not using FDE?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Saqib Ali)
Wed Jan 17 17:29:57 2007
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:33:54 -0800
From: "Saqib Ali" <docbook.xml@gmail.com>
To: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
Cc: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <20070116220352.C912A766073@berkshire.machshav.com>
On 1/16/07, Steven M. Bellovin <smb@cs.columbia.edu> wrote:
> I don't think that that distinction is either necessary or sufficient.
Dr. Bellovin,
I would like to invite you to try out a Free FDE product called
Compusec < http://www.ce-infosys.com/ >
After trying, please let me know if the distinction between "disk
encryption" (e.g. TrueCrypt) and "full disk encryption" (e.g.
Compusec) is insufficient.
Note: I am not affiliated with Compusec in any manner.
Thanks
saqib
http://www.full-disk-encryption.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
