[77040] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: MS responds to Gutmann's Vista paper
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Peter Gutmann)
Tue Jan 23 09:37:25 2007
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
From: pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz (Peter Gutmann)
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com, krstic@solarsail.hcs.harvard.edu
In-Reply-To: <45B2B73C.1040001@solarsail.hcs.harvard.edu>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:09:25 +1300
=?UTF-8?B?SXZhbiBLcnN0acSH?= <krstic@solarsail.hcs.harvard.edu> writes:
>Aside from admitting to increased CPU utilization, which seemed pretty
>incontestable anyway, they're disputing [0] many of the points made in the
>original paper [1].
Their response is a mixture of technical content and PR handwaving, I've
responded to the latter as part of the Vista writeup at
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.html#response, and will
be integrating the technical clarifications into the body of the writeup when
I get time
Peter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
