[85638] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: AES128-CBC Question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Erik Tews)
Thu Apr 19 17:40:31 2007
From: Erik Tews <e_tews@cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>
To: Aram Perez <aramperez@mac.com>
Cc: Cryptography <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
In-Reply-To: <A8F835E9-0111-1000-EF54-E3BE510C6815-Webmail-10009@mac.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 22:30:23 +0200
--=-B6YkmsCmVosqw4RIWv0p
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2007, 23:29 -0700 schrieb Aram Perez:
> Hi Folks,
>=20
> Is there any danger in using AES128-CBC with a fixed IV of all zeros? Thi=
s is being proposed for a standard "because that's how SD cards implemented=
it".
That depends. What would be a valid attack on a SD-card?
--=-B6YkmsCmVosqw4RIWv0p
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBGJ9Ff1V7s4RB7CAcRAkwCAJwJ+RhVZ8Nny2ies7uEjoHPIUaiqgCeJ4D7
D4Bux3jSwAAwlZa9x8/OIBw=
=EF5+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-B6YkmsCmVosqw4RIWv0p--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com