[13104] in APO-L
Re: Voting on Pledges...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeffrey N Woodford)
Fri Oct 27 21:20:53 1995
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 20:19:12 -0500
Reply-To: Jeffrey N Woodford <jwoodfor@UNLGRAD1.UNL.EDU>
From: Jeffrey N Woodford <jwoodfor@UNLGRAD1.UNL.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list APO-L <APO-L@VM.CC.PURDUE.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <9510271704.AA01830@unlgrad1.unl.edu> from "Kirk J. Brady" at Oct
27, 95 12:02:03 pm
> Hey All,
>
> Maybe it's just me, but what the heck is the point in having ANY
> requirements if you plan on voting people in anyway? Isn't that kinda
> defeating the purpose of setting the standards in the first place?
Well, fulfilling requirements can be used as a benchmark to measure a
pledge's progress.
-Jeff
--
Jeffrey N. Woodford | Alumnus, Kappa Chapter, Carnegie Mellon Univ.
jwoodfor@unlgrad1.unl.edu | Brother, Alpha Sigma Chapter, Univ. of NE-Lincoln
Physical Chemistry Graduate TA...er, Slave...no, Student, yeah, that's it
