[15488] in APO-L
coed verse vs singl
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (fox matthew)
Tue Nov 12 11:53:23 1996
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 11:50:41 -0500
Reply-To: fox matthew <mfox3@GL.UMBC.EDU>
From: fox matthew <mfox3@GL.UMBC.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list APO-L <APO-L@VM.CC.PURDUE.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.3.95.961112113120.16704A-100000@rpa10.gl.umbc.edu>
> i have had enough hearing about this issue to
> finally chime in.
>
> First from what i have seen in on this issue makes me believe this is an
> any male issue. for the following reasons
> in vmi and citidel situation it was because they all male .
> there is double standard because no female public funded schoool have
> been force to execpt males the are 2 all male schools in country and guess
> what 70 some all female schools.
>
> so what does have do with apo at some schools that have all male chapter
> there are all female groups that apo either works with or fufill similar
> functions. so i do not think it apo's right to interfer with balance.
> if a school insits apo go co-ed at an all male school i think is
> apo right to support that chapter. i think most schools are to noisey
> student organization these schools are probley tring to social engineer
> there campus and socail engineering is wrong when it relates
> to none accademic groups if school has problem with such groups it should
> ban all soc group.
> i think this issue is an none issue and any resolution on it is biased.
>
>
> matthew fox
> alumi alpha gamma chi
> frostburg md
>
> spam me if like but this issue has beaten to death give a rest
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
