[15991] in APO-L
The rules
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Pepsi)
Thu Jan 9 13:25:42 1997
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 13:18:21 -0500
Reply-To: Pepsi <pepsi@OLIVIER.PC.CS.CMU.EDU>
From: Pepsi <pepsi@OLIVIER.PC.CS.CMU.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list APO-L <APO-L@VM.CC.PURDUE.EDU>
Some proposed rules for the new
apoal-l (alumni list) to start tomorrowish-
Sat. ish when the bugs are yanked out.
Your list owners are trying to fair.
What do y'inz think? -Joy
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 13:15:16 -0500
From: benno@us.ibm.com
To: pepsi@olivier.pc.cs.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: No more pre-subs..
Classification:
Prologue: Yaneev Benno, IBM Southbury
Office C3-A80, Mail Drop #349
Epilogue: --
Yaneev Benno, User Access and Measurement Reporting
T/L 376-2059, outside (203) 262-2059
IBM Internal: benno@ibmusm00
Internet: benno@us.ibm.com
Sounds good to me. Here are the ideas that I had for the rules of the list:
1) no spamming (starting off with the obvious one)
2) posts should have something to do with alumni. Posting chapter events for
the purpose of keeping alumni informed is
perfectly acceptable in my opinion. All in all, the list exists to provide
a communication medium Beteen alumni, as well as
between alumni and actives.
3) Topics that are extremely personal should be saved for private email (i.e.
no inside jokes really, and no ex's giving detailed
personal information about subscribers).
Other than this, general Netiquette should apply.
Whaddya think?
Yaneev
