[16789] in APO-L
Re: ALCHOHOL POLICY
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lyn Belzer)
Wed Apr 30 14:03:43 1997
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 13:01:57 -0500
Reply-To: Lynore_Belzer@BAYLOR.EDU
From: Lyn Belzer <Lynore_Belzer@BAYLOR.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list APO-L <APO-L@VM.CC.PURDUE.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <01IIBFEFJSDE8X5W0A@baylor.edu>
On Wed, 30 Apr 1997 13:50:12 -0400 Jeremy.Gagliardi@cpmx.saic.com wrote:
>Okay, all opinions aside, the fact remains that the alcohol policy
>specifically refers to official APO events where pledges or rushees are
>required to attend. Any other event is fair game.
Yes, I'm aware of that. But as pledges and rushees are at present at most
functions (depends on how long your pledging period is, and all that), it seems
that the policy would apply to (dare I say?) most events.
>Also, in regards to your words about the brother who drinks then drives,
>that's his/her personal decision. Because the alcohol policy does not
>cover that, you should enact a chapter policy. If you don't have a
>chapter policy, then get together as "concerned brothers" and run an
>alcohol education campaign.
Hey, you just asked me for a few good reasons why alcohol should be absent. I
thought that was one. Also, it was to illustrate that the policy is
*preventative,* not *punative.*
>Sorry, it's getting long...Further discussion of this can probably take
>place offline.
That's why God invented the Delete key (for editing). :) (Sorry, trying to
lighten up what is turning into a darned depressing and touchy discussion.) But
we can continue this off-line if you like.
In Leadership, Friendship, and Service,
Angel
