[17676] in APO-L
Re: all-male chapters
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (dolphin)
Thu Nov 20 13:06:13 1997
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 13:02:36 -0500
Reply-To: dolphin <sklarsky@MATHCS.DUQ.EDU>
From: dolphin <sklarsky@MATHCS.DUQ.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list APO-L <APO-L@VM.CC.PURDUE.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.971120124034.18531A-100000@tavarua>
i knew that someone would eventually pick this apart, i realize that we
are coed nationally, when i said about never being in a coed fraternity i
was looking at it from the chapter standpoint. my chapter, my fraternity
is not coed. something like kappa psi (pharmacy), mu phi epsilon
(music), kappa delta epsilon (education), delta sigma pi and phi chi
theta (business) all have coed chapters on our campus. i therefore
consider them to be coed and since my chapter is not coed, then i do not
consider myself to be a member of a coed fraternity.
john s.
On Thu, 20 Nov 1997, MINDI ANN SEIDEL wrote:
>
> This is the ONLY thing I will say on all-male issue
>
> John - YOU ARE IN A CO-ED FRATERNITY.
>
> I have no problem with chapters being all-male, all-female, all gay,
> all-straight, all-black, all-white, all-Whatever - so long as we do our
> best to uphold the principles of Alpha Phi Omega
>
>
>
> Mindi
>
> On Thu, 20 Nov 1997, dolphin wrote:
>
> > i have never been in a coed fraternity, but my opinion of why i think all
> > male is better. i feel that by being all male, we are a closer knit
> > group.
> >
>
>
