[17761] in APO-L
Re: A-Phi-Q chapters- 2 questions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (MATTHEW A. MCLEAN)
Mon Nov 24 11:55:00 1997
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 11:52:00 -0500
Reply-To: "MATTHEW A. MCLEAN" <mamclean@HAMLET.UNCG.EDU>
From: "MATTHEW A. MCLEAN" <mamclean@HAMLET.UNCG.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list APO-L <APO-L@VM.CC.PURDUE.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <199711240423.XAA10005@dilbert.uncg.edu>
the "Q" part comes from the english translation of "Omega". it is
translated as "Q" by some people and not as "O". They would see it as
A-Phi-Q instead of A-Phi-O.
there ya' go
matt mclean
phi kappa Fall '94
unc-greensboro
On Mon, 24 Nov 1997, Bret Webster wrote:
> Don
> I"m sorry if i offended ... i did not intend to attack anybody ... i just
> wanted to know.
> Dress, time nor location makes the ritual any different for chapter, the
> brother from the Q chapter indicated they had rituals that differ from those
> in the ritual book.
>
> I do not see how the second question has anything to do with pride ... i
> have no problem with the all male chapters being proud of their chapter or
> their fraternity... i wanted to know about the Q ... it has nothing to do
> with Alpha Phi Omega ... that i can see.
>
> Bret Webster
> Beta Delta
> At 11:13 PM 11/23/97 -0400, dspa0239@ACC.FAU.EDU wrote:
> >
> >On Mon, 24 Nov 1997, Bret Webster wrote:
> >
> >> Hello brothers,
> >> I just have a couple of questions for my own couriosity.
> >>
> >> 1. Is it not against our national by-laws to have rituals not prescribed by
> >> the national by-laws ????
> >
> >bret why don't you be more productive and quit trying to attack your
> >fellow brothers, although the attempted set up showed inteligence it did
> >not show very much brotherhood.
> >
> >The rituals performed by chapters can very to a great degree. Dress,
> >Location, Time and many other variables are left up to the chapter.
> >
> >>
> >> 2. Why do Q chapters feel a necessity to differientiate themselves by
> >> calling it A-phi-Q ????
> >
> >It's called pride...
> >For example, I am proud to be from a Co-ed chapter of a Co-ed Fraternity
> >that allows diversity to prosper.
> >I enjoy our differnces and love our similarities.
> >
> >Thanks
> >Don "Big Daddy" Sparks
> >ADL Chapter
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance for any insight you can share.
> >>
> >> In LFS
> >> Bret Webster
> >> Beta Delta
> >>
> >> At-L
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tuesday, Nov. 18, 1997, Jeremy Licata wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Why do the A-Phi-Q chapters consider themselves a distinct part of
> the frat-
> >> >> >ernity?
> >> >>
> >> >> That's a VERY good question, Jeremy, and I have an answer. Because IMHO,
> >> it is because we have traditions, rituals, and events (and even service
> >> projects to some extent) unique to the mainstream of Alpha Phi Omega. We
> >> are proud of who we are, we just express ourselves a little differently than
> >> the norm. Yes, we do tend to hold the all-male tradition near and dear, but
> >> frankly, we like it that way. We hold the fact that we was founded by the
> >> Boy Scouts very sacred. We don't reveal all the details about our
> >> fraternity. We like to keep some stuff "secret". We do mention that we are
> >> co-ed, and we are not ashamed of that, but the chapters do not wish to
> >> become co-ed because Black campus culture dictates that fraternities are for
> >> men and sororities are for women, period, end of discussion. Only 2 A-Phi-Q
> >> chapters are co-ed (Alpha Epsilon--Louisiana State and Chi Upsilon--Dillard
> >> U., Dillard being co-ed by accident).
> >> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
