[18552] in APO-L
Re: EXEC MEETINGS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (andres)
Wed Apr 8 15:09:24 1998
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1998 15:07:53 -0400
Reply-To: andres <cab3411@GARNET.ACNS.FSU.EDU>
From: andres <cab3411@GARNET.ACNS.FSU.EDU>
To: APO-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
Sorry I sent this to only John instead of the whole list:
>John,
>Wow, you don't have exec meetings??? I think that is amazing. As president
of Iota Rho, I don't know what I would do without them. First of all, to
answer your previous question we have the following positions
> President - Exec
> VP of Membership - Exec
> VP of Service - Exec
> Treasurer - Exec
> Sergeant at Arms - Exec
> Pledge Trainer - Exec
> Parliamentarian - Exec
> Secretary of PR - Exec
> Recording Secretary - Exec
> Historian - Non Exec
> Rush Chair - Non Exec
>
>We have a chapter of 80+ Brothers and 50+ Pledges. Each officer is in
charge of their own duties, as stated in the Bylaws, and the President is in
charge of chairing the Chapter meeting, the Exec meeting, and coordinating
the actions of the committees and officers (among other things). The exec
meeting is where the officers get together to coordinate among ourselves and
to pass any motions that need not be passed in front of chapter.
>
>Question: Why do are you guys assigning two different VP of Membership
positions instead of just naming the second position as the Pledge Trainer?
>
>As for the risk management deal, there is no way that we would OK using any
chapter money directly to supply "tea." Who would want to conduct a meeting
while their officers/Brothers are under the influence of crumpets?
>
>It sounds to me as if you would bear a lot of responsibility. What is your
position like? I've got a lot of responsibility, but I feel that it deals
more with making sure everything is run in an orderly manner and that the
chapter does not forget our cardinal principles. I would really like your
input...As for me though, it's late and I gotta go.
>
>Yours in LFS,
>Carlos Bedoya
