[1414] in Discussion of MIT-community interests
Re: Wither MIT's AA? [re: Chronicle article]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Z Maze)
Tue Jun 24 16:03:26 2003
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:28:58 -0400
From: David Z Maze <dmaze@CAG.LCS.MIT.EDU>
To: MIT-Talk@MIT.EDU
At 12:50 PM 6/24/03, Justin M Nelson wrote
>There's a lot of information hidden in those two statements. What does it
>mean
>to be reviewed? Does Espinosa and Jones have power to accept all by
>themselves?
>I would hope not... but then one asks what percentage is typical of being
>thrown
>back in? If thrown back in to the regular admission process without any added
>preference, how could a person who was deemed in the lower 60% at first all of
>the sudden appear in the top 10% (roughly) at the end?
Well, plaintiffs in the future could call demand such clarification in the
future.
Rev Prez
P.H. Cannady
revprez@mit.edu
(617) 452 4470
Sidney Pacific Dorm
70 Pacific St
Cambridge 02139
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Documentation on the use of the mailing lists mit-talk, all-talk,
mit-news, housing-talk, and the mit-talk Zephyr class is available at:
http://web.mit.edu/institvte/talk/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Documentation on the use of the mailing lists mit-talk, all-talk,
mit-news, housing-talk, and the mit-talk Zephyr class is available at:
http://web.mit.edu/institvte/talk/
