[1448] in Discussion of MIT-community interests

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

same old new ballgame at MIT

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brian T. Sniffen)
Tue Sep 16 09:28:47 2003

Date:         Mon, 15 Sep 2003 18:30:58 -0400
From:         "Brian T. Sniffen" <bts@ALUM.MIT.EDU>
To:           MIT-Talk@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To:  <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309151401420.3607-100000@sub-zero.mit.edu>
              (wally@sub-zero.mit.edu's message of "Mon, 15 Sep 2003 14:15:13
              -0400 (EDT)")

Wally <wally@sub-zero.mit.edu> writes:

> Rhett's a grad student in course 22

Um.

> Rhett's .............. in course 22

Um.

> Rhett's .............. .. course 22

Well.  That puts the duration of this sort of argument in a new
perspective, doesn't it?

Hi ho.

But to take on something *truly* irrelevant and unchanging:

> the UA still doesn't really matter,

But they've got such a fascinating new set of election
irregularities:

* The electronic voting system is not auditable -- there's no way to
  do a recount, and there is insufficient published information on its
  security.

* Both the electronic voting system and the physical voting system are
  under the control of the incumbents.

* The polling staff were undertrained, to the point where they could
  not correctly identify which positions were open for election, even
  when provided with a list.  If words like "flashlight", "map", and
  "both hands" aren't running through your head now, read it again:
  they couldn't tell which races were running even with the list taped
  to the front of the voting box.

* Questions pertinent to the elections, like "How do I vote for a
  write-in for this position?" or "The pollworkers turned away an
  undergraduate; who precisely made this decision and how can it be
  appealed?" weren't answered in time to vote.

So maybe in nine years the Tech can write another "Fair Elections for
First Time in N years!" article, but it won't be coming this year.
Is it any wonder nobody bothered running from several dorms, or that
turnout was so low?  There's no reason to believe this is really an
election, when some candidates won with only a single vote, others are
appointed, and voters are turned away from the booth at random.

-Brian

--
Brian T. Sniffen                                        bts@alum.mit.edu
                       http://www.evenmere.org/~bts/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Documentation on the use of the mailing lists mit-talk, all-talk,
mit-news, housing-talk, and the mit-talk Zephyr class is available at:
http://web.mit.edu/institvte/talk/

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post