[1471] in Discussion of MIT-community interests
Re: urop cuts
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ellen Kranzer)
Wed Oct 1 00:14:42 2003
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 23:53:18 -0400
From: Ellen Kranzer <ccrazy@MIT.EDU>
To: MIT-Talk@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: <200309301955.h8UJts5r010682@mass-toolpike.mit.edu> (message from
Thomas Edmund Turner on Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:55:54 -0400)
And then there is also the difference between "not cut" and "funded at
a level that provides the same program." I have don't know anything
about the current UROP funding, but at work we deal with a governement
program that has been "level-funded" i.e. "not-cut" for most of the
past 10 years. What that actually means is that we're expected to
provide the same service with a 25%-30% cut in our real purchasing power.
-- Ellen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Documentation on the use of the mailing lists mit-talk, all-talk,
mit-news, housing-talk, and the mit-talk Zephyr class is available at:
http://web.mit.edu/institvte/talk/
