|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: Steven M Kelch <kelch@mit.edu> To: liz smith <lizsmith@mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20051021130602.258jyjuygc4c8s8k@webmail.mit.edu> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:11:38 -0400 cc: ec-discuss@mit.edu cc: mit-talk@mit.edu Errors-To: mit-talk-bounces@mit.edu So the trade off is that its super cheap, but everyone has to pay? Id rather have a more expensive pass that was optional. The guys in Boston that don't take the T very often since they live close to where they want to go won't need it, and that's a pretty good chunk of undergrads. On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 13:06 -0400, liz smith wrote: > Ten dollars is amazingly cheap per month... the current subsized subway > pass is > $22 a month. > > liz > > Quoting Allie Jacobs <fishie@MIT.EDU>: > > > Would that cover the bus or just subway? > > I think it's a decent idea, although $10/month might be a little > > much, and it should not be mandatory. MIT should offer a discounted T > > pass to people that want it, like grad students that don't live on > > campus. > > > > Allie > > > > Jessica H Lowell wrote: > >> According to the front page of the Tech, there's a preliminary proposal for > >> requiring all MIT students and staff to pay $10/month in exchange > >> for universal > >> T passes. This was the first I'd heard of this, though apparently > >> grad students > >> have been talking about it for a while. What are people's opinions on this? > >> > >> - Jessie > > > > _______________________________________________ MIT-talk mailing list MIT-talk@mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/mit-talk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |