[10351] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
CFS vs. loopback encryption (was Re: [open-source] File encryption)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nicholas Brawn)
Fri Feb 1 23:01:22 2002
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 09:02:09 +1100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v480)
Cc: jei@cc.hut.fi
To: cryptography@wasabisystems.com
From: Nicholas Brawn <ncb@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.10.10201300450160.5755-100000@alpha.hut.fi>
Message-Id: <56A53A20-175F-11D6-9052-000393471DA8@pobox.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
What are people's thoughts on CFS vs. loopback encryption? I've used CFS
in the past and found it quite useful, though as Matt said - a little
long in the tooth. Never really looked into loopback encryption (which
I'm aware is not something present across the majority of Unixes).
Nick
--
Real friends help you move bodies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com
