[10370] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: CFS vs. loopback encryption (was Re: [open-source] File encryption)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ian Goldberg)
Mon Feb 4 12:43:53 2002
X-Envelope-To: cryptography@wasabisystems.com
To: cryptography@wasabisystems.com
From: iang@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu (Ian Goldberg)
Date: 4 Feb 2002 17:30:52 GMT
Message-ID: <a3mggc$9ke$1@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu>
X-Complaints-To: news@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu
In article <56A53A20-175F-11D6-9052-000393471DA8@pobox.com>,
Nicholas Brawn <ncb@pobox.com> wrote:
>What are people's thoughts on CFS vs. loopback encryption? I've used CFS
>in the past and found it quite useful, though as Matt said - a little
>long in the tooth. Never really looked into loopback encryption (which
>I'm aware is not something present across the majority of Unixes).
I use loopback encryption on Linux (loop-aes.sourceforge.net).
I'm very happy with it. I have it encrypting data with a passphrase
and swap with a random key.
- Ian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com
