[10777] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: objectivity and factoring analysis

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eugen Leitl)
Mon May 13 17:03:21 2002

Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 22:32:52 +0200 (CEST)
From: Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org>
To: bear <bear@sonic.net>
Cc: Anonymous <nobody@remailer.privacy.at>,
	<cryptography@wasabisystems.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.40.0205130943540.5126-100000@newbolt.sonic.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0205132231480.4458-100000@hydrogen.leitl.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Mon, 13 May 2002, bear wrote:

> One thousand years = 10 iterations of Moore's law plus one year.
> Call it 15-16 years?  Or maybe 20-21 since Moore's seems to have
> gotten slower lately?

Moore's law is about integration density. That has zero to do with
problem-specific system performance. That one is indeed lagging.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post