[10780] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: objectivity and factoring analysis
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (R. A. Hettinga)
Mon May 13 17:37:50 2002
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p05111719b905d6cb467a@[66.149.49.6]>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.40.0205130943540.5126-100000@newbolt.sonic.net>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 17:01:19 -0400
To: bear <bear@sonic.net>, Anonymous <nobody@remailer.privacy.at>
From: "R. A. Hettinga" <rah@shipwright.com>
Cc: cryptography@wasabisystems.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
At 9:45 AM -0700 on 5/13/02, bear wrote:
> One thousand years = 10 iterations of Moore's law plus one year.
> Call it 15-16 years? Or maybe 20-21 since Moore's seems to have
> gotten slower lately?
Moore himself said in an article in Forbes a few years ago that the cost of
fabs themselves would eventually bring a stop to Moore's Law. He couldn't
see constructing a $100 billion dollar fab, and right now, fabs are in the
$1-$10 billion dollar range and going up...
He figured it to be the 20-teens or so for diminishing returns to finally
catch up with Moore's Law, if I remember right. If a water shortage on
Taiwan doesn't stop it dead in it's tracks this summer. ;-).
Cheers,
RAH
--
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah@ibuc.com>
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com