[147226] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [Cryptography] PRISM-Proofing and PRISM-Hardening
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Viktor Dukhovni)
Wed Sep 18 17:25:21 2013
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 20:47:17 +0000
From: Viktor Dukhovni <cryptography@dukhovni.org>
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <CAG5KPzxxrE7AX1nbKqkJ5TRRFKcPsQ0Kejd5_GJSwGL=XnRxjw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 08:04:04PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
> > This is only realistic with DANE TLSA (certificate usage 2 or 3),
> > and thus will start to be realistic for SMTP next year (provided
> > DNSSEC gets off the ground) with the release of Postfix 2.11, and
> > with luck also a DANE-capable Exim release.
>
> What's wrong with name-constrained intermediates?
X.509 name constraints (critical extensions in general) typically
don't work.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
